
February 18, 2026

Written By Katja Orel
Lead Editor, UGC Marketing

Edited By Denisa Lamaj

Fact Checked By Sebastian Novin
Co-Founder & COO, Influee
AppConTY is a Brazil-focused UGC platform for brands that want campaign-based creator content.
It positions itself around faster campaign launch, creator matching, and AI-assisted review flow.
Most teams start comparing AppConTY alternatives when they need clearer public terms for rights, revisions, and repeatable monthly cost planning.
This review breaks down where AppConTY fits and where Influee is the stronger option.
Influee | AppConTY | |
|---|---|---|
Creator scale | 90k creators in 23+ countries | 800+ creators disclosed (Oct 2025 company post) |
Revisions included | Unlimited | Not publicly disclosed |
Content usage rights | Belong to brand by default | Not publicly disclosed |
Pricing model | Subscription + 10% marketplace fee | One-time budgets; no public fixed plans |
Typical all-in cost visibility | Public plan and cost structure | Quote required for full pricing detail |
UGC videos starting at $80

3000+ Vetted Creators in Canada

AppConTY is built for brands in Brazil that want a managed UGC workflow without long software procurement cycles.
Public product messaging highlights campaign launch in up to 48 hours, AI-assisted creator matching, and campaign controls for brief, budget, and approvals.
As of February 18, 2026, the public site does not list standard plan tiers, default rights duration, or a numeric revision allowance.
A company update published in October 2025 states AppConTY launched in February 2025 and had 800+ registered creators and 20 active brands at that point.

Influee is the stronger choice for teams that need always-on UGC output with clearer operating and pricing logic across markets.
AppConTY can fit Brazil-first campaign activation. Influee is stronger for repeatable scale and long-run testing velocity.
AppConTY publicly reports 800+ creators (October 2025) and frames itself around a Brazil-led marketplace with campaign-based sourcing.
Influee has 90k creators in 23+ countries. When creator supply is shallow, teams usually hit slower approvals, repeated faces, and weaker testing velocity.
Bottom line: Choose AppConTY if your focus is local Brazil campaign execution. Choose Influee if you need larger creator depth for recurring multi-market production.
Influee | AppConTY | |
|---|---|---|
Default rights duration | Belong to brand by default | Not publicly disclosed |
Bottom line: Choose AppConTY if your team is comfortable clarifying rights per deal. Choose Influee if you want default ownership clarity from day one.
Influee | AppConTY | |
|---|---|---|
Revisions included | Unlimited | Not publicly disclosed |
Bottom line: Choose AppConTY if change requests are handled manually within each campaign. Choose Influee if you need unlimited iteration speed.
Influee Video Cost | AppConTY | |
|---|---|---|
Brazil | Varies by scope; scenario assumptions below | No public standard plan table on website |
USA | ~$82/video | Not publicly disclosed |
UK | ~$84/video | Not publicly disclosed |
Germany | ~$82/video | Not publicly disclosed |
Note: Influee figures are average 30s video costs by market.
Note: AppConTY does not publicly disclose a standard package matrix for ongoing monthly procurement on its main commercial pages.
Let's use a planning scenario in Brazil.
Need: 10 videos/month in Brazil
AppConTY cost: Not publicly disclosed, so exact all-in math cannot be pre-modeled.
Assumption for Influee scenario: €82 average creator payout and €229 monthly plan equivalent.
Cost at Influee: (10 x €82 x 1.10) + €229 = €1,131
Cost per video summary: AppConTY = Unknown, Influee = €113.10/video
When Influee is cheaper:
Influee is usually cheaper when teams need predictable monthly output, quick iteration loops, and transparent operating math before procurement starts.
When AppConTY is cheaper:
AppConTY may be cheaper in some local scopes, but without public pricing standards teams typically need direct sales discussion to validate that.
Bottom line: Choose AppConTY if custom quote-led buying is acceptable. Choose Influee if transparent recurring cost control is a priority.

Insense is a campaign-focused creator platform for brands that need repeat UGC and influencer workflows.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Best fit: Teams with recurring campaign calendars and a dedicated creator budget.
JoinBrands is a marketplace-style UGC platform with free-entry and paid plan tiers.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Best fit: Brands that want flexible marketplace entry and mixed-volume campaigns.
Usetwirl is a credit-based UGC platform for brands that buy content in planned blocks.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Best fit: Teams that prefer credit-led planning for medium to high volume.
Collabstr is a self-serve creator marketplace for direct sourcing across budget ranges.
Pros
Cons
Pricing
Best fit: Teams that want direct marketplace control with flexible buying.
UGC videos starting at $80

3000+ Vetted Creators in Canada
Influee, Insense, JoinBrands, Usetwirl, and Collabstr are strong options. The right choice depends on whether your team needs local campaign support or repeatable multi-market scale.
Yes. AppConTY positions itself around Brazil-focused campaign execution and local creator sourcing for brand UGC projects.
As of February 18, 2026, AppConTY does not publish a full standard pricing table for recurring monthly procurement on its main commercial pages.
A default rights duration is not clearly disclosed on public pages, so teams usually need to confirm rights terms during the sales process.
Influee is usually the stronger fit for scaling because it combines broad creator coverage, unlimited revisions, and transparent recurring cost logic for ongoing output.
AppConTY Review
#1 Alternative: Influee
Who Should Choose AppConTY
Who Should Choose Influee
4 Other AppConTY Alternatives
FAQ

Canada
Adam
Gander

Sheri
Oshawa

Scott
Amherstburg

Taydra
New Westminster
